Check references before they weaken your research
VerifyCitation focuses on the part that must be defensible before submission: whether each existing reference is real, and whether DOI, title, authors, year, and publication details agree with the evidence.
Built for verification of references you already have - not source discovery or citation generation
Verify references
Fast check - field-level evidence
Submitted bibliography
Split confirmation
Review before credits are reserved
Verification result
Evidence fields remain inspectable
Recent verification
References
3 checked
Status
Complete
Detail
Ready to reopen
Deep review appears only for results that need another pass, with the extra 5-credit cost visible before upgrade.
The real verification loop
The landing page now follows the product path researchers actually use: paste references, confirm the parsed list and credit estimate, inspect evidence-backed results, then reopen saved details when a citation needs to be defended.
Submit references
Paste one citation or a bibliography into the same input pattern used on /verify.
Confirm split and credits
Review detected references and Fast credit estimates before a verification starts.
Review results and evidence
Inspect DOI, title, authors, year, and venue evidence for every result status.
Reopen history details
Return to recent verification records and read the saved original input and evidence.
Verify references
Fast check - field-level evidence
Submitted bibliography
Split confirmation
Review before credits are reserved
Verification result
Evidence fields remain inspectable
Recent verification
References
3 checked
Status
Complete
Detail
Ready to reopen
Deep review appears only for results that need another pass, with the extra 5-credit cost visible before upgrade.
Trust starts with the reference list
VerifyCitation does not promise to write your bibliography or prove a paper supports a claim. It gives you a clear review surface for the source-existence and metadata risks that make citations fragile.
Find real source signals
Check whether a citation maps to a discoverable academic record before it reaches a supervisor, editor, or reviewer.
Verify citation metadata
Compare DOI, title, authors, year, and venue instead of trusting that a plausible-looking reference is authentic.
Keep human judgment in control
Results separate verified, unsure, conflict, missing, and error states so the next review decision stays visible.
Use credits transparently
Split confirmation and Fast estimates appear before verification, and Deep upgrades remain per reference.
What VerifyCitation checks on every reference
The product stays intentionally narrow: it verifies existing references and explains bibliographic evidence without expanding into claim support, source discovery, or formatting automation.
Reference parsing
Preserve the original text while confirming how the bibliography was split before credits are reserved.
Source existence
Check whether the reference can be tied to a credible academic record through available source evidence.
DOI evidence
Identify whether a DOI resolves and whether it points to the same work described by the citation.
Title comparison
Expose near-matches, stitched titles, or title drift that simple formatting checks would miss.
Author consistency
Compare author names and author combinations against the record that was found.
Year and venue
Surface publication year, journal, conference, publisher, or venue differences in plain language.
Evidence filters
Use compact assessment cards and filters to scan verified, unsure, inauthentic, and error states.
History review
Reopen previous checks with submitted text and saved evidence intact for later review.
Where a focused citation checker fits
VerifyCitation is useful when the reference list already exists and the risk is credibility, not ideation.
Before thesis submission
Screen a bibliography for fabricated or drifting references before the final draft is shared.
AI-assisted writing review
Check references that may have been copied from AI output without turning the app into a writing generator.
Editor triage
Prioritize citations that need manual review by looking at result status and evidence conflicts first.
Research group QA
Give collaborators a repeatable way to inspect reference evidence without sharing private API keys.
Literature cleanup
Find DOI, title, author, year, or venue mismatches in older notes and draft bibliographies.
Follow-up review
Return to recent checks and details when a reviewer asks why a citation was flagged.
Simple credit bundles for release review
These cards are temporary launch-pricing references for planning and visual review. They do not start checkout, create a subscription, or change the current credit logic.
Trial
15 credits
A small one-time bundle for checking a short reference list.
- Reference verification only
- Fast split and credit estimate
- Evidence fields and saved details
Monthly
150 credits per month
For recurring bibliography checks during active writing cycles.
- Reference verification only
- Fast checks plus eligible Deep upgrades
- History and detail review
Yearly
1,500 credits per year
For longer research projects that need predictable verification capacity.
- Reference verification only
- Consistent credit pool for batches
- Evidence-first review workflow
Believer
5,000 credits
A long-horizon credit reference for heavy citation review needs.
- Reference verification only
- Large credit pool for repeated review
- No team, export, or source-finder promise
Temporary pricing reference only. Final pricing, credit rules, and checkout behavior must be confirmed separately before public release.
Questions before launch
Clear boundaries matter as much as the interface polish.
Open the verifier and inspect the real flow
Use the product surface that the landing page now reflects: paste references, confirm credits, review evidence, and return to saved details.